My Italian mother taught me to say thank you. When I was a kid, if I forgot to thank someone, she would scold me. “What’s the matter with you? Our family is going to think I didn’t teach you good manners.” Then faster than a serpent’s strike she landed an open-handed right hook to my head. “Next time don’t forget.” I painfully caught the punch line that when someone bestows a gift upon you, don’t fail to give thanks in return. But there is one group of people that always fails at giving thanks, which is the subject of this blog.

Even as a grown man, Mom would call me on the telephone, before the days of cell phones, to monitor my gratitude meter.

“Did you call Uncle Dominic and Aunt Lina to thank them for the birthday card?”

“Yes Mom, I called them yesterday.”

During Christmas holidays she would ring me. “How come you didn’t call to thank me for the fruit cake and Christmas cookies?”

“Mom, I just received them – the mailman literally left seconds ago.”

When on vacation, she phoned my hotel room. “When are you going to send everyone a thank you card?”

“Mom, we’re still in Hawaii on our honeymoon.”

I understand all cultures have their unique way to say thank you. The traditional Italian American did not expect a value-for-value show of gratitude. If you ever visited the home of one of these Americans of Italian descent, invariable they fed you pasta, meat balls, sausage, antipasto, and heavy Italian pastries till they stuffed you to death. They didn’t expect their American friends to return the the favor with an Italian meal but only that you raved over their cooking and occasionally reciprocated with some nice gift. That was their form of thank you. But if you never reciprocated and offended “The family,” fuhgeddaboudit, if you know what I mean.  Saying or showing thanks is common among all cultures for maintaining healthy relationships. But soon I’d like to tell you about one group that refuses to give thanks.

I’m not talking about ingratitude due to forgetfulness or busyness, because true friends and family cut you slack for mistakes. But there is no grace offered to this ungrateful people group who show no intention of saying thanks. Not only should we thank our fellow man, but also God for His blessings. Here is just a very short list of some of God’s good gifts that endow us with sensual and emotional pleasure:

  • A sunrise or sunset emersed in a sea of yellow, orange, lavender, and red hues.
  • Colorful birds flaunting billions of shades of every color. In one Florida pond live snowy white egrets, blue, green, and purple herons, rosy spoonbills, and countless types of ducks. In every area of the globe exists different species of birds with their unique beauty. There is also the royal reigns of osprey, hawks, and eagles that reflect a heavenly majesty.
  • Endless wildlife can be seen roaming our globe and can be very exciting. I chuckle at grown adults who get awestruck by spotting an eight-point buck like they just discovered the view from Mount Everest, or panic at a ten-foot alligator like it was King Kong. The list of wildlife on Earth is endless. I have a friend, Dick, whose business is taking people on photography trips on lakes, though forests, and up mountains filled with eagles, tropical birds, monkeys, bears and all types of wildlife. He lives the dream job.
  • Colorful landscapes dress our world. In Summer, God accents green meadows with rainbow-hued flora. In Autumn, God’s palette overflows drenching His mountain canvas with colorful splendor.
  • Harvest moons, shooting stars, and billions of galaxies, leave us in awe of The Lord’s expansive and celestial majesty.
  • But all these beautiful creations bow down to the lord of all earthly pleasures which is the smile of a child or grandchild accented with the words “mommy,” “daddy,” “mimi,” or “papa.”

Its hard to imagine that God is both friend and family and overloads us with pleasures beyond the greatest human feast. The Bible quotes Jesus as saying “I have called you my friends.” And God Almighty refers to Himself as our Heavenly Father. And with the concern of a mother, He teaches us the importance of giving thanks by repeating that theme in the Bible over five hundred times. How is our thanksgiving meter this Christmas season?

Most of us, I suspect, do thank God in some small way by saying grace, whispering a thank you, or sneaking in a bedtime prayer, but there is always room for us to demonstrate more appreciation. But what’s annoying is to think there is one group who enjoy the above list of blessings but refuse to give thanks to the one who made it all possible. How can that be? Who is this group?

The group calls themselves Atheists who refuse to give thanks because they don’t believe in God. Some become quite militant if you even mention God, the Bible, or, heaven help us, “Jesus.” They get more aggressive than the bully who beat up Lou Costello for saying Niagara Falls. (Goggle “Abbott and Costello Niagara falls” to watch the YouTube of this skit).

I imagine God in His grace gave an atheist an opportunity to meet him in heaven for a temporary visit. I would love to be a fly on the wall of that meeting. Imagine God sitting in a throne chair surrounded by clouds and angels but in a friendly setting. He motioned to the atheist to take a seat facing him. God shuffled through a few papers. “Hmm … atheist” He peeked over his glasses. “So, tell me why you don’t believe in me. I like to give you an opportunity to present a logical answer.”

The atheist slid both palms up and down on his thighs and took a deep breath. “Well, I was taught in high school about evolution and how everything just evolved on its own.”

God placed his head in his hand. “You believe the teaching that this world happened by chance.”

The atheist looked away with pursed lips, and turned back and stared God in the eye. “Yes God, sir, I believe, statistically, that given enough years anything could build itself.”

God took off His glasses. “I see you think the earth and sea creatures and humans created themselves.”

“Yes sir, it’s a statistical possibility.”

“But did you think that makes any sense? That’s like saying a tornado could create a Boeing 747 by accident, if it passed over a junk yard every day for a billion years.”

The atheist scratched his head. “Well, when you put it that way …”

God leaned forward. “I hear you are a New York Times best-selling author, many times over.”

“Yes sir.”

God grabbed a book from his side-table. “To believe life happens by accident is to believe that If I placed the 2.5 million alphabetic characters and punctuations that make up this novel I hold, ‘Gone With The Wind,’ put them in a jar, shook them up, and emptied them on the ground every day for a billion years, eventually they would magically arrange themselves into chapters, paragraphs, sentences, a preface, a copywrite, and an index that make up ‘Gone With The Wind.’ Magically the story lines, characters, character arcs, and dialog that authors, like you, painstakingly design, could happen by chance or accident.

The atheist bit his nails while lifted his eyes. “Well, I guess it would be very unlikely. It makes more sense someone designed and created it.”

God replaced his glasses and looked solemnly at the Atheist. “I am that designer and creator. Do you have anything else to say?

With a questioning tone, “Uhh … thank you?”

At this point God took serious action, and summoned His secretary of reciprocation – my Italian mother – to stand by His side and interrogate the atheist. Quicker than a ninja turtle, she landed a sharp slap to his head. “What’s the matter didn’t your mother teach you any manners?

The atheist covered his head expecting another blow.

Mom gave the Italian hand gesture for “what’s-the-matter-for you.“

The atheist trembled in his chair. “I’m sorry, maam.”

Mom pointed at the atheist. “The next time God gives you a gift, you won’t forget to say thanks.”

Suddenly the atheist disappeared back to earth, and we can only hope he became a believer.

One of the greatest gifts God gave to mankind was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah:

“For to us a child is born and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins”

Therefore, this Christmas, let us be sure to say thank you.

8 responses

    1. Appreciate you reading – Thanks Jim!

      Like

  1. Thank you for the message. Merry Christmas

    Bernie and Marcia

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for reading! Merry Christmas and Happy New Years to you both and family!!

      Like

  2. As always, us atheists are told that we need to be thankful to some god, and these theists can’t even show it exists at all. Each of them claims a different god is the “creator” and the one we should thank. Still waiting for them to show it exists.

    And do explain why I would thank the christain god since it is a rather hateful mess that supports genocide, killing people for things they didn’t do and slavery. I have far higher standards than that.

    Nice to see how christians make false claims and not a single one of them can do what their jesus promises to his true followers. They are all frauds per their own bible.

    Like

    1. I understand your desire for proof and are frustrated that “theists” can’t show “it” exists. I don’t have an issue with that statement because I realize people who don’t believe in any form of god rely upon logic and reason and science. I have no issue staying at those levels to discuss who is responsible for creation and that is why the God in my story does not use the Bible but reason to discuss creation, because reason is what I think atheists base their belief on. Neither atheists or those who believe in the Bible were around to witness creation of life either by a creator or by macro evolution. So neither side can “show” or use a scientific proof. I can’t ask God to create Adam and Eve in a laboratory to prove my point nor you can you show me a cellular organism in a lab evolving into a fully formed human. Neither you nor I have scientific proof for creation. But rather than attempting to show proof of a creator, which you ask for but which neither of us can do scientifically, can we use logic and reason to discuss creation.

      What my blog tries to present is a simple philosophical argument about how it makes more sense to say a creation implies a creator in that a jumbo jet implies a Boeing-creator, and a novel implies an author-creator. My argument against evolution by chance is that it’s logically inconceivable. In fact, the New York Times bestseller I allured to in the article, is actually a great person, a loving husband, father and grandfather, and also very graceful in writing instructor. But he turned from belief by blaming his Christian roots which were somewhat distorted from what the Bible teaches. But rather than use people who distort and misrepresent Christianity as a reason not to believe in any kind of God, can you and I use logic and reason?
      So, can we discuss logically if chance, accident, or random processes over billions of years could have created books, airplanes, or animal life?

      Is it reasonable to believe that life created itself without a designer or creator of any kind? My argument is that a creation of planes or books implies a creator and even more in the case of microbiologcial organisms which are vastly more complex. DNA contains instructions for creating physical life and other microbiological parts that read the DNA like a computer reads a disc drive. There are biological motors involved in the creation of body parts. Using biological science as our data, we know that cells in our body contains DNA and RNA which are vastly more complex than a 747 or “Gone With the Wind.” So the complex creation of our bodies implies an intelligent creator, in my belief. If you really believe that human life can happen by chance, then that is your religion, but it’s not a science because you can’t prove it in a laboratory or with evidence. But I respect your religion and hopefully you respect mine. Based on our own world experience, a creation implies a creator, a design implies a designer, and the world is full of examples of humankind creations by creators.

      So if you want to discuss creation using logic and science and laboratory proof, we’re both out of luck because and we must rely upon belief. The point of the “Christmas Thank You Note” is that either one must believe creation of life on earth happened by chance or by design, unless you have another option. I believe it happened by design so that is why I believe in God as the creator and not a mindless evolutionary process. As far as which god, the point of the article was not to make that argument, but that the creator may expect a logical explanation for not believing. So, we only have two choices: 1) We believe the earthly and heavenly creations of this world happened by some miraculous accident. 2) They happened by some miraculous designer/creator. Which do you believe? That is the only argument we really can have but I hope you won’t be like the few atheists I’ve discussed this topic with where they refuse to answer the question. Instead their reason for not believing in some form of a creator (Not necessarily the Christian, Jewish, Muslim, etc. creator) is based on distorted views of these religions instead of trying to defend their own view.

      Like

      1. It’s notable that you rely on logic, reason and science when it makes your life comfortable and only lie about it when it shows your religion to be false. And your god in your story doesn’t use any of these things to discuss creation, using rather hilarious strawmen of what evolutionary theory says and what abiogenesis research says. I particularly like this completely false claim here “God took off His glasses. “I see you think the earth and sea creatures and humans created themselves.”” Funny how atheists don’t believe that at all, so your nonsense about first cause arguments fail for the rest of the story.

        As I noted, not one theist can show that their “creator” even exists, much less has done what they claim. It’s hilarious when you claim that “but but no one was around to see how it happened, thus goddidit”. Happily, we have evidence on how it happened since evolutionary theory is a predictive theory and we see what was predicted. We are still working on how abiogenesis works and even if we do not completely understand it, still no evidence a god exists at all.

        I do note that you admit evolution occurs, with the typical Christian attempt to lie and claim that somehow “macro evolution” is different from “evolution”. As usual, christains must follow science, always playing catch up when science is undeniable. Creationists used to not even grant that evolution worked at all.

        Why can’t you ask your god to create life in a laboratory? Surely it could, right? You have to modify your requests since you know that your god doesn’t answer them. I don’t need to show a single celled organism evolves into a human since we have the evidence that it has, from the fossil record to genetics. I have plenty of scientific evidence for abiogenesis and evolution. You have no evidence your god exists at all.

        Your blog tries to spread the common lies that theists use in their need to claim that their gods exist and created everything. The first cause argument, aka the cosmological argument, fail since they depend on a premise that has nothing to support it: a god exists. Nothing shows that a god is needed at all; a simple force could be the “first cause”. Nothing shows that intent is required at all.

        You tried to use the tornado in a junkyard argument which fails since there is nothing showing that only one tornado and one junkyard is what is needed. There could be many tornadoes, many junkyards and still no need for your imaginary friend.

        The person you made up in your story is a typical strawman invented by many Christians. It’s always fun when christains think they should be surprised when an atheist is a loving parent, etc. You also show the typical Christian nonsense by trying to claim that no other version of the religion is right except yours. Unsurprisngly, your version is no more true than any other, and you all claim each other distorts and misrepresents christanity.

        No evidence that “random accident” as you define it caused things. That is the typical ignorance Christians show when they attack things they are too cowardly or lazy to learn about. You attack a strawman version of the sciences as usual.

        If your god created things, then you need to explain why it is so utterly stupid, or malicious, when it does so. DNA fails often and horribly, so your appeals to it are amusing and wrong as usual. The human body guarantees that thousands of humans choke to death every year. The sun gives humans and other animals cancer. This is the supposed “design” your god has done.

        Science isn’t a religion, and it is typical for a Christian to lie about that since you all seem to need to claim that everyone agrees with you in some manner. Happily, we do not. I have no reason to respect a religion that spreads ignorance, hate and fear. My experiences does not show that there is a creator at all. Human creations aren’t a universe, so your analogy fails at the core.

        I’m not “out of luck” at all, only you are when it comes to evidence for your religious claims. I don’t need to rely on believe in imaginary nonsense at all and thus I don’t need to thank that which doesn’t exist. No need for a “miraculous accident” at all. It’s always amusing when a Christian thinks they can offer two choices and demand that one be picked.

        I have no distorted views of any religion. I accept what the many many theists claim as the truth and point out how not one of them can show that their claims are any better than the next theist’s. That you all attack each other is just amusing to me. Especially when not a single one of you christians can show that you can do what your jesus promises to his true followers.

        Like

  3. As I stated, instead of atheists providing a logical explanation for evolution or making a sound philosophical case as to how life created itself by chance their main argument is to falsely attack Christian religion for the past 2000 years as evil and shameful. We admit belief in God is a philosophy and not a science just as macro evolution is a not a science. To qualify for a science, one would have to show proof of God or evolution creating life in a lab, but neither can so we are confined by theories and logic outside the realm of faith. I offered you a chance to provide a sound logical argument for the theory of evolution and how did you do?

    You attacked God, Jesus, religion, theists, and me at least eight times but had no solid argument for the logical case of animal life self-constructing and designing themselves by chance. You proposed, as science, macro evolution, the theory large-scale evolutionary changes (fish into reptiles, reptiles into mammals, etc.) occur over billions of years, until finally creating man by some magical accident. How do evolutionists explain such bizarre magic? Evolutionists claim that over billions of years, millions of small changes happened between each life group. If we had a time-elapsed video camera a billion years ago and set the frequency of each shot at 1000 years, we would have a time-elapsed video with one million frames. Though no such electronic recording device existed one billion years ago, but the camera is the belly of the earth that records the history of life in fossils. Therefore, archeologist should have been able to uncover over the last two hundred years of digging, a vast number of these slow-mo fossil frames. They should have unearthed thousands of fossils recording these intermediate creatures like insect-fish, fish-reptiles, reptiles-mammals, and monkey-men. Just ten fossils for each transition could prove evolution. But archeologists combed the earth for the last two-hundred years, and did they find millions of fossils? No, did they find tens of thousands? No, did they find one hundred or even ten? No, would you believe they did not find even one except for some bone fragments that require the imagination of a fiction writer visualize a transitional species. If evolution is your argument, you have no data that supports the slow-motion fossil evidence. Without the data to support your macro evolution you propose a theory. So, your statement is false: “I don’t need to show a single celled organism evolves into a human since we have the evidence that it has, from the fossil record … I have plenty of scientific evidence for abiogenesis and evolution. “Where’s the beef, I ask. Then you say, “You have no evidence your god exists at all.” So, we go round in circles to my original post that neither of us can prove our creation theories but logic can disproved false theories.   

    And you fail to employ any logic on how DNA and RNA, a biological creation more complex than the Encyclopedia Britannica and more complex that a automobile engine, created itself since experience shows creations imply a creator. For instance, novels are created by authors, buildings are created by construction engineers and skilled workers, 747 jumbo jets that levitate three hundred to four-hundred tons into a weightless coma are designed by aerospace engineers. Designs imply an intelligent designer unless you can show me an example otherwise. I gave the illustration that to believe otherwise is as absurd as believing it is possible for an accidental phenomenon to design and create a 747 jumbo jet. It is like believing a tornado plumaging through a junk yard every day over billions of years could eventually create a jet by accident. However, your reaching-for-straw response was to propose my example was a straw man example. Instead you proposed a stronger example that thousands of tornadoes going through thousands of junk yards would likely create a Boeing 747. That’s still as illogical because creations do not happen without an intelligent design.

    To your defense you propose a new word as responsible for creation, “abiogenesis.” However, this is just a head-fake tactic because it’s another way to propose life created itself by chance, or by macro-evolution. You suggest “abiogenesis” is some new scientific discovery but write, “We are still working on how abiogenesis works and even if we do not completely understand it.” You can’t make sense of it because evolution makes no logical sense because it proposes books write themselves without authors, watches create themselves without watchmakers, and jumbo jets assemble themselves without aviation, electrical, and mechanical engineers.

    You falsely and wickedly lashed out at the church, the Bible, and its believers as your argument for evolution instead of providing a logical basis for evolution. That is because some simple logic blows it over like a house made of straw. We have logic to refute evolution like the idea of “irreducible complexity” coined by microbiologist Micheal Behe, that some biological systems are too complex to have evolved from simpler systems. In lay terms Behe would ask how a lung evolves while the circulatory system and blood is evolving. Or how does the brain evolve while its waiting millions of years for the lungs to evolve. The brain suffers major neurological impairment after just ten minutes without oxygen, so it certainly would not survive ten million years without ‘O’ or oxygen. It makes more sense that life happen instantaneously like a divine creator said let there be life.

    I wish you would have not been like the other atheists who, because they can’t defend an illogical concept of life creating itself without a designer and who think that Christians are easy targets that check their brains at the church door, violently attack people of faith and regurgitate evolution without any basis for it. You talk about” “first causes” but have no explanation for the ultimate first cause of all matter. Where did the universe, one-hundred trillion stars and associated planets come from? Scientist claim matter can’t be created or destroyed but just changed from matter to energy and from energy to matter. So whatever form matter was in at the beginning, then who or what created it? Something was always here and you propose it was matter with no explaination of its first cause, but bible-believers propose it was God, an intelligent designer, the first cause who created life by design and intent.

    Granted, I can’t prove God exists but at least God makes logical sense because creation implies an intelligent designer, and the Bible tells us God was an intelligent being. The Bible states God was never created and always was and the first cause of all things. Evolution can’t explain irreducible complexity but it makes sense that God created all the organs of the body at the same time so they could be inter-function from the start. What’s in your logic. Is your only logic for evolution to attack God and religion? That’s not an argument for why you should believe in evolution. You did not accept my offer to show how evolution makes sense on its own merits.

    The fact that you provided has no logical basis or science to support your argument for evolution is because your reasoning is false. I started by saying in my article that we cannot prove creation either by God or evolution because we can’t demonstrate it in a lab or have sufficient data. But with logic and reasoning we can make sense out of truth and expose lies and false statements. Your basis that a mindless chance process of evolution fails to give provide any logical basis because it doesn’t reveal data for the millions of missing fossils-frames, it doesn’t explain how it overcame irreducibly complexity, and it doesn’t show examples of creation without a creator. Your theory is full of lies so the reason you attacked my faith as your main argument is because you have no basis to support yours. Thanks for confirming that arguing with an atheist is useless because their only strategy is to be lowering themselves to name-calling, and attacking the church, Christ, and God as useless and evil actors in the history of the world. But they fail to provide substance for their false beliefs of life creating itself, which is premise of evolution, or abiogenesis.

    PS: I will not be responding to any more of your rebuttals because your strategy will continue to be the same: deflect responsibility by assailing God and religion, and theists.

    Like

Leave a reply to irockoon Cancel reply